|
|
Post by Lantern Lad on Apr 18, 2006 17:07:44 GMT -5
*head explodes*
|
|
|
|
Post by starlord on Apr 18, 2006 17:11:35 GMT -5
*comes in with bucket and mops up*
|
|
|
|
Post by Lantern Lad on Apr 18, 2006 17:28:08 GMT -5
Now what are you going to do for your Legion fix??? My head all went & exploded & I've only got through issue #4!
|
|
Susan Hillwig
Staff 
I'm not crazy, my mother had me tested.
Posts: 1,612
|
Post by Susan Hillwig on Apr 19, 2006 2:07:52 GMT -5
And "exploding head syndrome" strikes again! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by HoM on Apr 19, 2006 6:07:09 GMT -5
Sorry about all that.
Tee hee...
|
|
|
|
Post by brigante133 on Apr 19, 2006 9:40:52 GMT -5
Now what are you going to do for your Legion fix??? My head all went & exploded & I've only got through issue #4! (sorry tried to quote you and accidentally hit modify...  ) don't worry scott, we will have a cartoon of them by then to satisfy a fix. you will not be necessary  |
|
|
|
Post by markymark261 on Apr 19, 2006 11:24:41 GMT -5
But if you think about it, Mister Bossman Sir, Rorascharch was a character used instead of The Question, meaning that they are related in a way that is quite interesting... Both using mask's both looking for answers, but both characters having vastly different methods of obtaining those said answers. So to incorporate that personality into The Question would be an interesting way to see what happens when a vicious personality comes to the surface of a fractured psyche, and how the main personality reacts to that. That being said, Mr A was also in this, another early Ditko creation. I am so on the ball in ways you can only imagine... Whereas I got the Rorschach reference (and even the Mr A reference come to that), the reason I disliked it was that, ever since Watchmen, I've considered The Question, despite being the original deal, as a poor man's Rorschach. Now, with this series, you seemed to be writing a quirky, distinct version of The Question that stood on his own. The fact that you're now blending in this Rorschach persona (based on a dead character from outside the DC Universe) seems to imply that you think there's something lacking in your central character, although I'm probably totally misinterpreting things and it was probably just a clever reference on your behalf. |
|
|
|
Post by Lantern Lad on Apr 19, 2006 12:39:22 GMT -5
Now what are you going to do for your Legion fix??? My head all went & exploded & I've only got through issue #4! (sorry tried to quote you and accidentally hit modify... ) don't worry scott, we will have a cartoon of them by then to satisfy a fix. you will not be necessary Ramon, everytime you respond directly to me in a thread that statement comes through loud & clear. |
|
|
|
Post by HoM on Apr 19, 2006 13:15:27 GMT -5
Boys, boys, please, leave all the anger out of this thread... Go take it to the cleverly named "Just an excuse to swear" thread in The Writer's Workshop, and just... Shh. All of you shush your mouths.
And Markyman, thanks for the feedback, and I understand what you're saying, it's just I wanted a violent, gritty, angry facet of TQ's personality, and as my basic idea of this series is to bring together all parts of the character into a new interpretation, i thought it bed to bring Rorrrshhhhharshhh into the pot, and then do my thing in the next issue, which I hopefully will write soon.
|
|
|
|
Post by markymark261 on Apr 20, 2006 11:17:14 GMT -5
Actually, thinking about it some more, whereas the introduction of the Rorschach persona initially seemed to defy logic, zoom's comment about The Question reading Watchmen made me realise that young Charlie/Vic/whoever could have read Watchmen and, in a wonderful example of topsi-turviness, based his Question persona on Rorschach. Now that my continuity qualms are out of the way, I'm actually beginning to think it's a really good idea, allowing you to examine the differences between TQ and Rorschach (whereas most Question writers would just sweep Rorschach under the carpet and try and forget about him, I'm impressed you're tackling the problem head on). Looking forward to next issue.
|
|
Zoom
Staff
Bleargh!!!
Posts: 397
|
Post by Zoom on Apr 20, 2006 20:28:24 GMT -5
Yeah, that's just what I wanted to say.....really...
|
|
|
|
Post by HoM on Apr 26, 2006 5:54:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Romans Empire on May 4, 2006 21:05:08 GMT -5
Sad. Pathetic and down right disturbing! Those are the things that come to mind when I think of this interesting character you have chosen to torture! As for the setting: I picture it cold and raining and the sun never shines!
All this adds up to something thats very depressing or extremely entertaining! I will choose the later! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by HoM on May 6, 2006 17:01:33 GMT -5
Yeah... Uh... Yeah. Thanks, I guess. Check out the first week of June for the final third issue! No more third issues after this!  |
|
Dr Dread
Staff
The Odious-1
Posts: 1,547
|
Post by Dr Dread on May 7, 2006 7:22:35 GMT -5
Just a Happy Birthday shout out to DC2's sine qua non Question scribe.
|
|
|
|
Post by Admin on May 7, 2006 8:38:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by starlord on May 7, 2006 12:13:26 GMT -5
HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!!!
TO THE MAN WITH THE PLAN!
|
|
|
|
Post by brigante133 on May 8, 2006 1:15:32 GMT -5
ditto chuck.
|
|
|
|
Post by HoM on May 8, 2006 10:11:37 GMT -5
Oh you guys... |
|
|
|
Post by tragdor on Jun 27, 2006 19:11:28 GMT -5
I love this comic, but to nitpick its spelled Objectivist not objectionist emphasis on the capital O. They are very picky about that kind of thing and if the Question was a full blooded Objectvist he would have a hissy fit if someone got the name of the philsophy wrong
|
|
|
|
Post by HoM on Jun 28, 2006 16:14:40 GMT -5
... It's philosophy... If someone with a philosophy saw you spelling it wrong they'd throw a hissy fit... |
|
|
|
Post by tragdor on Jun 28, 2006 20:25:35 GMT -5
... It's philosophy... If someone with a philosophy saw you spelling it wrong they'd throw a hissy fit... d'oh oh the irony....*checks to see if if he spelt irony right* |
|
)
